The dark side of snap judgments: prejudice

http://implicit.harvard.edu/

The Implic­it Asso­ci­a­tion Test mea­sures how easy it is for us to asso­ciate con­cepts to one anoth­er and pro­vides mea­sure­ments for our auto­mat­ic pref­er­ences. The results may be shock­ing as they may reveal the effect of strong cul­tur­al bias­es that the sub­ject is either unaware of or con­scious­ly opposed to.

I think of myself as a pret­ty lib­er­al guy. I believe in egal­i­tar­i­an­ism and I am a firm pro­po­nent of human and civ­il rights with­out regard to skin col­or. I real­ize that I prob­a­bly have some prej­u­dices, but I hope that they are not so pro­nounced as to be noticable.

The Race IAT bowled me over. I agree with the log­ic of the test and I don’t believe that it mea­sures my beliefs, but I think it prob­a­bly does a good job of mea­sur­ing uncon­sid­ered assump­tions. And it basi­cal­ly called me a big­ot. I could tell as I took the test how dif­fi­cult it was to asso­ciate «hap­py», «safe» or «laugh­ter» with the face of an African American.

This is very dis­turb­ing. Go try it your­self and let me know what you think.

4 Replies to “The dark side of snap judgments: prejudice”

  1. Exact­ly. The ques­tion, IMO,
    Exact­ly. The ques­tion, IMO, is, are you aware of your racism, and how do you react to it? Do you embrace it, try to negate it, or over-cor­rect for it?

    On anoth­er note: is racism just endem­ic to our cul­ture, or are we bio­log­i­cal­ly hard-wired for it? There are, I think, obvi­ous evo­lu­tion­ary advan­tages to pro­mot­ing your own race over others.

  2. .…are you aware of your
    .…are you aware of your racism, and how do you react to it?

    The most pop­u­lar answer in our soci­ety seems to be “deny it, to your­self and others.”

    And denial works about as well on racism as it does on alco­holism, addic­tion, fam­i­ly dysfunction.…

    .…is racism just endem­ic to our cul­ture, or are we bio­log­i­cal­ly hard-wired for it?

    Despite what many folks seem to believe, racism was not invent­ed by the Unit­ed States, and oth­er cul­tures are not havens of egal­i­tar­i­an enlightenment.

    In the 20th cen­tu­ry, the most atro­cious acts of racism were per­pe­trat­ed by groups of peo­ple of one col­or upon groups of peo­ple of the same col­or. Nazi-Jew, Japan­ese-Chi­nese, Hutu-Tutsi.…

    Humans seem to be pro­grammed to pick an “oth­er” (and all you Lib­er­als out there who think you’ve tran­scend­ed that, tell me what you think about the Red States) and blame them for what­ev­er’s “wrong” with their world.

    As for sim­ple prej­u­dice, which seems to be what was exposed in Splicer’s tak­ing of the test, I firm­ly believe that it exists in most crea­tures as a sur­vival mech­a­nism. There’s no way our brain can take in all the infor­ma­tion that our sens­es deliv­er, so the brain takes short­hand. Much of that short­hand is based on what it has learned pre­vi­ous­ly. White boys at the mall took your skate­board? Brain equates white boys with “dan­ger.”

  3. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, a lot of it
    Unfor­tu­nate­ly, a lot of it is cul­tur­al con­di­tion­ing that goes beyond direct expe­ri­ence. One of the stud­ies ref­er­enced in the book took some num­ber of African-Amer­i­can stu­dents and gave them all the same test, but with a ran­dom sam­pling giv­en a cov­er page that asked them to state their race instead of just their name and age. The group that was remind­ed of their race at the begin­ning scored sub­stan­tial­ly low­er on the test. Sub­stan­tial­ly like an aver­age of fif­teen points low­er out of 100. So it’s not just blacks fear whites and whites fear blacks in the “oth­er­ness” you describe. It’s accept­ing a cul­tur­al judg­ment and a set of implic­it asso­ci­a­tions with race. I real­ly wish I could tran­scend it.

    It’s poignant that you bring up the fact that oth­er cul­tures are not havens of egal­i­tar­i­an enlight­en­ment. I hear (fre­quent­ly lib­er­als) talk about how Native Amer­i­can tribes accept­ed every mem­ber with equal voice in deci­sion­mak­ing. When it’s brought up that some of those very same tribes would kill a mem­ber of a neigh­bor­ing tribe on sight with­out hes­i­ta­tion, those folks make excus­es that well, yeah, its nat­ur­al that the tribes would see com­pet­ing tribes as out­siders and not offer them the same pro­tec­tion that they gave them­selves. Yet those same peo­ple will decry as hyp­o­crit­i­cal the Dec­la­ra­tion of Inde­pen­dence and the Con­sti­tu­tion of the Unit­ed States because nei­ther doc­u­ment put an end to slav­ery, even though they set forth ideals that, once enshrined into our nation­al con­science, even­tu­al­ly put an end to slav­ery, and ideals that we still have yet to live up to 230 years lat­er. I guess if you want to believe in progress you can find hope, but if you just want to point fin­gers there are always tar­gets for that too.

Leave a Reply