Paper Notebooks
It’s no secret that I love pens, so of course I have a lot of opportunity to use paper. In my illustration I use Strathmore smooth finish Bristol. I was taught that I was supposed to prefer kid finish, but it seems too toothy to me; too easy to tear up. Maybe it’d work out if you’re doing all of your work in brush, but metal pens tear that stuff to shreds. And I’ve never thought about it that much. Pads of Bristol aren’t cheap, but they aren’t precious either. It’s always been a utilitarian decision without much romance attached.
Writing notebooks are another story. There’s an incredible amount of hype surrounding writing notebooks, and I’ve tended to view the hysteria as somewhat curious. I cannot sit in any judgememt of course, I do have romantic attachment to stationary. I very much like my old stand-by, Crane’s 32 lb 100% cotton «executive» sheets in Pearl or Ecru White. On the other end of the spectrum is Eaton’s air mail paper, a 9 lb 25% cotton stock that’s nearly transparent and delicate like a butterfly’s wing. I also have a small variety of stocks purchased by the sheet from Flax and some lovely translucent letter-size stock that will hold ink neither from a fountain pen nor from an inkjet printer. Suffice it to say that I buy correspondence stock in much greater quantities than I send out in correspondence.
So believe me, I’m sympathetic and more than a little curious about the great popularity of specialty journals and notebooks. There are the Moleskine faithful, the Levenger fans, all with their justifications for spending fifteen to fifty dollars for a notebook, and of course a nearly infinite supply of refillable (usually) leather journals. And you can’t forget those orange Rhodia notepads.
Some have claimed that the paper in these premium notebooks isn’t really all that much better than that found in common composition books. Now I’ve gotta say that I’ve gone through my share of Mead composition books, and for a couple of bucks nothing beats ’em. There are some specialty varieties, but the plain Mead «composition» seems to be the best. The «Grad» has a very nice durable cover, but the pages are too thin to write on both sides even with a ballpoint. It’s important, too, to inspect the labels. Some say «Made in the USA» and others are «Made in China». I don’t know if it’s possible to get an American-made Mead notebook anymore, but my 1994 (USA) Mead composition book is a bright white, where all my 2001 and 2004 (Chinese) Mead composition books have started to yellow. So hey, maybe fat, lazy, spoiled Union workers really do put out better products than Chinese convicts and twelve-year-old slaves. I know. Radical idea, isn’t it?
(I meant to draw a comparison between the Mead notebooks and the variety of Walgreens house-brand notebooks, but looking more closely, the Penway (US-made) notebook has a decent, smooth feel to it. (Chinese-made) Corner Office notebooks are like lined newsprint. The Penway isn’t as good as the better Mead composition books I have, but perhaps I should be looking more at the country of origin rather than the brand name.)
To satisfy my own curiosity, I spent what seems like an obscene amount of money on premium notebooks. I bought a variety of Moleskines, a Clairefontaine, and a Miquelrius. I didn’t bother with the «premium» journals from Cavallini. I’ve used them before. Wonderful bindings, crappy paper. ‘Nuff said, I’m afraid.
Already, this seems insane. I’ve never put this much thought into purchasing sketchbooks, and I’ve always gotten paper far superior to what’s found in most composition books. Maybe that’s the answer for the journal snobs out there. Give up needing lined paper, and suddenly good paper is easy and relatively inexpensive. Cachet makes the ubiquitous black hardcover sewn-binding sketchbook filled with 70 lb ph-neutral paper for ten bucks, and last I checked New Jersey has labor laws that prevent using petty criminals as slave labor. That compares nicely to the price of the «premium» notebooks I bought. But I digress.
I won’t write about the Moleskines quite yet, as I have more arriving this week. I haven’t written anything in the Clairefontaine notebook I picked up and cannot yet comment. That leaves the Miquelrius.
I’ve written at least a page with each of my fountain pens (and some that don’t belong to me) in my black Miquelrius notebook and have a pretty good feel for it. Miquelrius’s website is a lovely example of Web design for Web designers, specifically for the designers that designed the Miquelrius website. Anyone else should stay away. The whole thing is Flash and has wonderful transparent effects and sliding menus and is, of course, totally devoid of information. Thankfully Pendemonium has the information I wanted: yes, the paper is acid-free. The company supposedly guarantees the paper to endure for a century. That I couldn’t find this information on Miquelrius’s site is further evidence against hiring Web designers who are in love with their fancy effects.
Anyway, the notebook’s got a durable cover and end papers, which I can’t help but think is a classy touch. I don’t like the feel of the cover that much; it’s a textured flexible plastic that wants to feel like leather but ends up just feeling slick. The actual paper is clean white, reasonably opaque but not brilliant. If it really stays like that for a hundred years, you can’t go too far wrong with it. I wrote «reasonably opaque» because yes, you can see my writing on the opposite side of the leaf. It’s not distracting and certainly acceptable, but not as opaque as I’d prefer.
The paper is smooth and appears durable. Good pens glide across it well. There is a hint of texture to it, like gravel beneath a well-tuned suspension. It’s enough to provide a tactile experience, but it’s nothing that will bump you out of your seat. It’s ruled a bit wide for my taste, but that’s just a matter of preference. Compared to the Mead paper, this is smoother. If the claims of longevity are true, this would be a good notebook for writing one would want to keep for posterity. I like the elastic band that holds the cover shut as well. It’s a nice touch. At ten or eleven dollars each, you can get three Mead composition books for the price, but you have to give some consideration to the historians who will be reading your journals after you’re dead.
While I remain somewhat cynical about the idea of premium notebooks, ten dollars instead of three or four is really not bad considering the paper quality, durability, the nice extras, and supporting the economy of a country where the workers get afternoon naps instead of a country where the workers might avoid a beating if they do a good enough job.
I liked those Miquelrius
I liked those Miquelrius leather-like notepads, but I got the big one (trying to save money) and the binding was too tall for me to write comfortably.
I’m left handed, and had grade school teachers who didn’t teach left handed kids to hold the paper any differently. So, I turn the paper the wrong way and hook my hand over the paper.
I do most of my writing in a plain old GRAD 3‑subject wirebound notepad. I glue-stick one of my snapshots on the cover, and that helps me keep track of them. The paper is nice, the wirebound is sturdy and doesn’t deform.
I’ve gone from being a pen snob to sticking to disposables. Most of the time I use a Bic fine point stick or an ancient Papermate blue medium stick pen which I’ve had for something like 10 years. Smoothest writing pen I’ve ever had. I like to think I’ve smoothed it with miles of writing.
Chinese notebooks are made
Chinese notebooks are made by convicts and child slaves? Nice racial stereotyping, and way to suck up media sensationalism and government propaganda. Also, I doubt union papermill workers have any say in the formulation of the paper products.
A good writer can make insightful observations about even touchy subjects with wit and irony, but this attempt fails. It’s neither accurate nor apt.
I’m willing to stand
I’m willing to stand corrected on the question of child labor. While child labor has been a problem in China in the past, it has been mostly eliminated. I was corrected on this point elsewhere and I concede that the comment was out of line.
However, China is a nation that utilizes forced prison labor. The trade agreements with the US stipulate that no products will be imported to the US that were made by prison labor, but those clauses are rarely enforced. When attempts have been made by the US to investigate suspected violations of this agreement, the Chinese government has not permitted investigation. So it’s difficult to say conclusively that any product imported from China was not made by slaves.
(I’ll clarify my use of the word “slave” here: the US uses prison labor as well, but prisoners who labor are required to be paid and cannot legally be forced to go to work. Those that do do so for admittedly very low wages and for privileges, it could even be said that they are coerced, but US prisoners are not forced to labor. In the Chinese prison labor system, there is neither choice nor compensation. My use of the word “slave” is deliberately inflammatory, but accurate.)
Even if a product was not directly manufactured by forced prison labor, the economy is supported by prison labor to some extent, and many products are made with materials sourced from prisoner-labor camps.
Many industries cannot use prison labor. It’s probably safe to assume that your iPod or cellphone was assembled by skilled Chinese workers who are being compensated in a reasonable fashion.
Paper, on the other hand, is a product very likely to be associated with prison labor. One of China’s largest producers of paper is the Shanghai Paper Factory, which is a prison. Textiles and leather and paper goods are very commonly produced by prisoners. Tanning leathers, which involves handling highly caustic chemicals, is almost exclusively done by prison labor, as expensive protective measures (such as gloves) are not required for prison laborers.
You’re right that I have no proof that a Mead notebook was created by slaves, but I have enough solid evidence that these practices are commonplace — the use of forced prison labor is not hidden by the Chinese government, only the shipment of such goods to the United States — that I am very uncomfortable with the idea of purchasing paper products manufactured in China and unsurprised when I see paper products that decrease in quality when their production is moved to China.
Would you call me a racist for not purchasing diamonds from the Congo?