and the winnah is

ATT vs VerizonVer­i­zon.

My ear­li­er AT&T ver­sus Ver­i­zon post was labeled «part one» for a rea­son: it was writ­ten before I had any basis for com­par­i­son. Now, three weeks and two days into my con­tract with Ver­i­zon, I’ve yet to expe­ri­ence a dropped call. There are places with strong sig­nals and places with weak sig­nals; that’s no dif­fer­ent on Ver­i­zon than AT&T. But the most impor­tant dif­fer­ence is that I can hold entire con­ver­sa­tions with­out being dis­con­nect­ed a half-dozen times in suc­ces­sion. On AT&T I was lucky to get ten min­utes of unin­ter­rupt­ed talk time.

The one kind of ser­vice I got from AT&T was lip ser­vice about cor­rect­ing their prob­lems. I lost count of the AT&T rep­re­sen­ta­tives I talked to about the prob­lems I had with their cel­lu­lar ser­vice. They all told me that mea­sures would be put in place to fix the issue. Noth­ing ever changed. 

AT&T has an iPhone app just for report­ing ser­vice prob­lems, and I used it fre­quent­ly as well. How­ev­er, the iPhone app did­n’t inspire con­fi­dence: every time I sub­mit­ted a prob­lem report, the app told me I would receive a text mes­sage con­firm­ing the report. Out of the dozens of times I saw the dia­log box promis­ing my con­fir­ma­tion by text mes­sage I nev­er received even one.

I do have a few com­plaints with Ver­i­zon. It is true that on Ver­i­zon’s net­work it is not pos­si­ble to have an active data con­nec­tion while talk­ing on the phone. I can hard­ly count that in AT&T’s favor con­sid­er­ing that on their net­work it was not pos­si­ble to talk on the phone with or with­out a data connection.

Ver­i­zon has also been slow to issue the 1.4.5 update for WebOS, the plat­form my phone runs on. It was released weeks ago and Sprint users have had the update per­formed auto­mat­i­cal­ly since the begin­ning of the month. Ver­i­zon also removed Yahoo instant mes­sag­ing sup­port from the WebOS Mes­sag­ing appli­ca­tion with­out any good rea­son; Sprint cus­tomers have Yahoo in their Mes­sag­ing apps. Ver­i­zon users can use only AIM or Google Talk.

These are annoy­ances, but they seem like minor quib­bles in the face of the fact: Ver­i­zon’s net­work sup­ports phone calls. AT&T’s does not.

Also in Ver­i­zon’s favor: although I’m pay­ing Ver­i­zon a bit more than I was pay­ing AT&T, I’m get­ting a lot more val­ue. My account includes device teth­er­ing for free up to 5 giga­bytes per month, which has allowed me to use my lap­top on the Inter­net over my cell­phone. AT&T’s 2Gb teth­er­ing plan costs an addi­tion­al $25 every month.

I still have reser­va­tions about send­ing mon­ey to a CDMA cel­lu­lar provider—I don’t think the Unit­ed States needs to have a cel­lu­lar pro­to­col that does­n’t work in the rest of the world—but I have greater reser­va­tions about con­tin­u­ing to send mon­ey to a com­pa­ny that pro­vid­ed me with faulty service.

It’s real­ly too bad. As not­ed ear­li­er, I had stel­lar ser­vice with AT&T for years before things start­ed going down­hill. I’m sad that their decline was so dra­mat­ic that I had to leave. They shot them­selves in the foot; cus­tomer loy­al­ty comes only with ven­dor loyalty. 

 

 

Leave a Reply