Lying with statistics
In the wake of Jimi Heselden’s tragic Segway accident Monday, media outlets have seized upon a small study done at George Washington University Hospital and breathlessly issued sensational headlines. MSNBC says, «Segway Scooters Can Lead To Serious Injuries, Experts Warn» ABC News asks, «Are Segways Safe?» Even WebMD claims, «Serious Injuries From Riding Segways Increasing» without any indication of whether the increase is in proportion to the use of Segways. 383,000 people died in the US in 1900. A century later, the US had 2.4 million deaths. You could say that death is «on the rise» except that there were about twenty times more people in the US in 2000 than there were in 1900. The mortality rate per capita has actually been cut in half.
The George Washington University Hospital study compared the injuries of people who arrived at the emergency room after a Segway accident with the injuries of people who arrived at the ER after being hit by a car. Just using that as a yardstick sounds like an attempt at creating bias. They found that proportionally more people who came in to the ER after a Segway accident ended up being admitted to the hospital than were admitted after being hit by a car.
It makes it sound like riding a Segway is therefore much more dangerous than getting hit by a car. Which just doesn’t pass the smell test.
Actually it really means that falling off a Segway is more dangerous than getting hit by a car. That doesn’t pass the smell test either. Actually, none of the 41 patients in the study died. I don’t know how many of the nine pedestrians killed by automobile in DC in 2008 ended up at GWUH’s ER, but if even one did failing to mention it in a study comparing car accidents with Segway accidents seems misleading.
Consider the difference in what a reasonable person would do after getting hit by a car or after falling off a big electric scooter. Even if knocked down with nothing but scrapes and bruises it’s likely someone hit by an automobile will make a trip to the emergency room. A simple fall from a Segway won’t trigger the same automatic response. Typically after a short fall that doesn’t involve an automobile a person will dust themselves off, check themselves to make sure that everything is OK, then get back up and go about their business.
So of all the Segway-related injuries that happen, only a small numberthe very worst oneswill end up in the emergency room. Of all the pedestrians struck by automobiles, many will end up in the ER even if they aren’t injured.
A better comparison would be to compare Segway accidents with skateboard or perhaps bicycle accidents. Or better yet, compare Segway accidents statistically with the aggregate of all accidental trauma cases in the emergency room.
Trouble is, even-handed facts and analysis might not support the evil-technology-turned-on-its-creator narrative that makes such good headlines. Information doesn’t capture the attention the way that scaremongering does.
It would be useful to learn how safe the Segway is, and those who are collecting data about people injured while using Segways should be lauded. However, collecting and presenting this information should always be a process of uncovering and interpreting the truth, not a distortion of truth to fit an agenda or sell newspapers. This sort of thing makes us less safe. Our decisions about what to do are based on what we learn to be safe or unsafe. At best we can’t trust the information we are handed, and at worst our decisions will be based on false information.
We should expect better than this from our media outlets. More importantly, we should expect better than this from the scientists and researchers upon whose data and analyses we are counting.
And for the record, it’s not ironic that the owner of the company that manufactures the Segway died while riding a Segway. It would be ironic if he died in a skateboarding accident, or if he fell over the embankment just after stepping off the Segway. Dying while riding his own product is just tragic.