Venerean phases

Venus has been very bright in the evening sky late­ly, as you may have already noticed. A friend of mine was play­ing with an astron­o­my pro­gram on his iPod Touch while we were walk­ing the oth­er evening and asked what «that bright star» was. I said that an object in the sky as bright as the one we were look­ing at could only be Venus (cor­rect) and I spec­u­lat­ed that Venus might be brighter when far­ther from us, because we’d be see­ing more of the bright side (not cor­rect. Sorry!)

Said spec­u­la­tion was wrong because I’d under­es­ti­mat­ed the change in appar­ent size of a plan­et that always looks like a point of light to the naked eye. Venus orbits at about sev­en-tenths as far from the Sun as we do. When Venus is at its clos­est to us it is about 0.3 Astro­nom­i­cal Units (one AU is the dis­tance from the Earth to the Sun) which is very much clos­er than 1.7 AU so even in cres­cent phase the bright side of Venus takes up more space in the sky than when it is full on the oth­er side of the Sun. (I’m not going to both­er with the math for how far away Venus would be at var­i­ous points on its orbit rel­a­tive to us. «A lot clos­er» is good enough for me.) This appears to be true until the cres­cent gets very thin.

An Astron­o­my Pho­to of the Day from a cou­ple of years ago illus­trates this.

It seems that Venus is approach­ing as near to us as it ever gets. I’m assum­ing that for my pur­pos­es I can dis­re­gard the ellip­ti­cal nature of Venus’ orbit because Wikipedia says that Venus’ orbit is much clos­er to cir­cu­lar than ours. Venus will tran­sit the Sun in the begin­ning of June and we pass per­i­he­lion in the begin­ning of July, so I think it’s fair to say that Venus is pret­ty darn close now and will be near­ly as close as it ever gets in June.

(I could do the math for this as well, but my math skills are so rusty that it might take all after­noon and I’m too lazy to do that right now.)

I took my binoc­u­lars out to look at Venus last night to see whether I could see a cres­cent shape. I thought that I glimpsed the cres­cent through my 12x binoc­u­lars, but owing to them being binoc­u­lars it’s dif­fi­cult to get a per­fect­ly sharp focus in both eyes at the same time. It’s also very dif­fi­cult to find an ade­quate sur­face to use to keep the binoc­u­lars steady. Even prop­ping my arm against the ground there was enough move­ment in my hands that I did­n’t get as good a look at Venus as I’d like. It’s dif­fi­cult to know whether my eyes actu­al­ly resolved the cres­cent shape or if my mind filled in the blank from see­ing motion «blur» from per­sis­tent vision or mono­chro­mat­ic aber­ra­tion in the binoc­u­lars’s lens (or my eye, for that matter.)

It’s too bad that I don’t have enough mag­ni­fi­ca­tion to see clear­ly the sec­ond-near­est object in our solar sys­tem. Liv­ing in the City means fight­ing to see through light pol­lu­tion, and I don’t have any­thing stronger than the 12x binoc­u­lars. I’ve won­dered at the pos­si­bil­i­ty of get­ting a tele­scope, but it would have to be a pret­ty small one in order to be trans­portable with tri­pod on my motor­cy­cle, and I’d need the motor­cy­cle to get the ‘scope far enough away from the City that I’d get dark skies.

7 Replies to “Venerean phases”

  1. Venu­sian.…

    …is the far more com­mon­ly-used adjec­tive. Venere­an, vener­ian, and vene­r­ien are gen­er­al­ly con­sid­ered obso­lete. Inter­est­ing arti­cle, though, and good to hear you are still look­ing up!

    You should be able to see the cres­cent shape start­ing with about 8x binoc­u­lars. My arm-held 6″ f/4 rft shows it clear­ly at 19x. Maybe I’ll take my 7×50 binoc­u­lars out the next time it is clear. See! You’ve inspired me!

    One inter­est­ing point is that Venus is bright enough to cast a shad­ow here – on moon­less nights, of course. The first time I ever noticed this was at Stel­lafane. I was in the Porter Tur­ret with the door open, and as I glanced away from the eye­piece I saw the bright out­line of the door on the floor and wall. My first thought was that it was an air­plane, but it did­n’t move, so I went to the door and looked. Venus, in all her glory!

    Dad

    1. Vene­re­al?

      I for­get whether it was Neil deGrasse Tyson, but some­one whose lec­ture I lis­tened to in the last few years said that the cor­rect term should be «Vene­re­al» but that it isn’t used because of oth­er con­no­ta­tions (though it’s all named for the god­dess of love.)

      Good to know that see­ing the cres­cent was prob­a­bly not just my imag­i­na­tion. It would still be great to see with some­thing that is not hand-held. It would­n’t take very much more mag­ni­fi­ca­tion to make it a real­ly great sight.

  2. Tests

    Tonight I went out with sev­er­al sets of optics to view Jupiter. I left the big boy in the shed as the answer to whether you can see Venus’ cres­cent with a superb 12″ scope on a steady mount seems rather obvi­ous. First I tried my hand­held 6″ f/4 at 19x and 30x. It was hard­er than I remem­bered get­ting the view steady enough, but Venus was clear­ly cres­cent shaped. (Hand­held is a lit­tle bit of a mis­nomer. I use a shoul­der strap and cra­dle the tube assem­bly tight­ly across my chest with both arms.) Next I tried my excel­lent Fuji­non FMTR 7×50 Polaris binoc­u­lars. It was not easy, but I final­ly was able to con­vince myself that I was not just imag­in­ing the shape. Steadi­ness was not much of an issue, but the image was pret­ty small. Final­ly, I took out my Swift 60mm 15x-60x spot­ting scope. It has a small tri­pod for use as a tar­get spot­ting scope when shoot­ing prone, so I laid in the road and used the tri­pod. It was sim­ple, clear, and steady at the 60x end, but the optics aren’t as good at the 15x end, so focussing was a bit of a chal­lenge. After focussing, I was able to stand and hand­hold at both 15x and 60x and see the cres­cent cleanly.

    So, IMHO you should have been able to see the cres­cent in your 12x binoc­u­lars. BTW, I usu­al­ly focus on stars before turn­ing  to Venus. It is soooooo much eas­i­er to tell when a pin­point is small­est than to tell when a blob is sharpest.

    Dad

    1. Wait. Jupiter?

      Wait. Jupiter? Accord­ing to the GoSky­Watch app on my iPhone, Jupiter is direct­ly on the oth­er side of the Sun. Maybe I’ll have to con­sult anoth­er source for locat­ing plan­ets. If you can see Jupiter, GoSky­Watch has a bug. 

      It was cloudy last night but tonight I’ll try focus­ing on a star first and then check out Venus. Thanks for te sug­ges­tion! Though it does look pret­ty hazy to the West. We might have fog/clouds roll in this evening like we did yesterday. 

    1. The 4.25″ ‘scope

      My tele­scope is in Albany. It’s not ter­ri­bly portable so even if I had it here in Cal­i­for­nia it would­n’t get used very much. I think I’m going to need some­thing with a real­ly short focal length. 

Leave a Reply