Needs work

The authors of Rework claim it was edit­ed down from 57,000 words to 27,000, and that the book is bet­ter for it. One of those claims is easy to believe; the lan­guage is clear and direct. But what­ev­er fluff was tak­en out should have been replaced with some substance.

The com­ments sec­tion of on my report on Mal­colm Glad­well’s Tip­ping Point echoes Voltaire that com­mon sense is not com­mon, and attribute Glad­well’s suc­cess to this fact. I like to give Glad­well a lit­tle more cred­it; per­haps his con­clu­sions are—or should be—common sense, but he went to the effort not just to assert his con­clu­sions but to research and ana­lyze them. Jason Fried and David Heine­meier Hans­son gave us a book of com­mon sense with­out any of the sup­port or analy­sis Glad­well supplied.

Stop telling me how great you are, show me!

I haven’t much patience for authors who con­grat­u­late them­selves. Con­grat­ul­ing them­selves for pedantry is that much worse. The authors claim to chal­lenge the con­ven­tion­al busi­ness wis­dom (is this an oxy­moron?) The intro­duc­tion claims that it will «gut» busi­ness and rebuild it. The  first chap­ter talks of the «new real­i­ty» we work in. They hold up exam­ples of what «a lot of peo­ple say» in con­trast with the authors’ own wis­dom. It’s great that they believe pas­sion­ate­ly in their own ideas, but it reads as though they’ve start­ed to believe their own PR.

The first sen­tence of the intro­duc­tion claims that the authors have new ideas, and the sec­ond sen­tence says that these aren’t aca­d­e­m­ic but based on their own expe­ri­ence. What fol­lows is a col­lec­tion of 200 – 300 words dec­la­ra­tions. That’s not just con­cise, it’s sparse to the point where the advice los­es its use­ful­ness. As a result, the book comes off as being aca­d­e­m­ic. It’s almost 300 pages (not real­ly, but I’ll get to that lat­er) of appeal to the authors’ own author­i­ty. Con­ven­tion­al wis­dom says one thing and the authors have tried it and it did­n’t work. So there. On to the next topic.

Aside from their claim to authority—they’ve been in busi­ness for ten whole years—lack­ing author­i­ty, the book needs to explore ideas, not just assert them. A few con­crete exam­ples would go a long way toward mak­ing the book access­able. A few digres­sions into under­ly­ing prin­ci­ples or sup­port­ing argu­ments would go a long way toward mak­ing the book believable.

The prob­lem? It’s dif­fi­cult to let the ideas sink in. I’d start read­ing, and fin­ish a chap­ter on aver­age forty sec­onds lat­er. What am I sup­posed to do then? Go on to the next idea and for­get all about this one.

The best way to use this book might be to read it in a group or with a part­ner. Read a chap­ter out loud, and then dis­cuss it for five min­utes, or ten min­utes, or how­ev­er long it takes to flesh out the ideas. That’s great I sup­pose, but I’m of the opin­ion that it’s the writer’s job to flesh out ideas for me. This was­n’t a book, it was a Pow­er­point slideshow on paper.

And that’s exact­ly the big­ger prob­lem. This was­n’t even a Pow­er­point slideshow, it was a blog. Not a blog like Mono­chro­mat­ic Out­look where there’s no edit­ing for length, either. This book almost could have been fit into 37Signals’s Twit­ter feed. Even a col­lec­tion of very brief essays can have over­ar­ch­ing struc­ture and a pro­gres­sion of ideas. Rework has very lit­tle tying the dis­crete essays togeth­er. The essays don’t build on one anoth­er and each does­n’t lead to the next. They just sit there with­out rela­tion or cohe­sion. As a result, what might be valu­able advice is sim­ply lost.

Illustrations made the book

A review would­n’t be com­plete with­out men­tion­ing Mike Rohde’s illus­tra­tions. They are fun, punchy and effec­tive. Rohde deserves a lot more cred­it than he got (a men­tion at the bot­tom of the copy­right page which, not inci­den­tal­ly, is locat­ed at the back of the book) for turn­ing this dif­fuse col­lec­tion of essays into an enjoy­able expe­ri­ence. 88 of the book’s 277 pages are full-page Mike Rohde illus­tra­tions, and that does­n’t count the fif­teen full-page chap­ter head­ings. Guys? You filled 174 pages. If each author con­tributed equal­ly, each filled 87 pages. Rohde filled 94. Don’t you think a men­tion on the cov­er is called for?

The illus­tra­tor turned this pam­phlet into a book. My rat­ing of Rework with­out Rohde’s input to the book would have been one and a half stars instead of two and a half. More­over, it sold the book to me when I leafed through it. Open­ing a small book to find 18-point type with gen­er­ous lead­ing is a dis­ap­point­ment akin to tak­ing a swig of hot water from your cof­fee cup. I bought a Mike Rohde book. Jason Fried and David Heine­meier Hans­son wrote some com­ple­men­tary text.

The authors of Rework can talk all they like about wabi-sabi, keep­ing the flaws, and being proud of what is left out, but all of that is pred­i­cat­ed on putting val­ue in in the first place. For twen­ty-two dol­lars in hard­cov­er, I expect a good deal more than a book that can be fin­ished in the time I’m wait­ing for a doc­tor’s appointment.

Go see Mike Rohde’s «sketch­notes» work.
Do take a look at 37Signals’ blog Sig­nal vs Noise. I think it makes a much bet­ter blog than book.