Gun Control
Having a discussion (more like hearing a lecture) about gun control with a coworker recently. He was going on about the restriction on the Barrett .50-caliber sniper rifle, and how it is unwieldy and expensive and not the sort of weapon that can be used to hold up a store or a bank. He made a very compelling case that the rifle was of no interest to criminals.
I said to him, “well what do you expect? These are politicians passing the laws.” I think he expected me to make some point about politicians being idiots but he wasn’t quite sure what I was talking about, so he said, “Yeah, and…?”
“Well, what’s the ONE crime you could use a highly-accurate insanely- powerful long-range sniper rifle for?”
He cracked up and admitted that the Barrett ban would never come off the books.
He cracked up and admitted
He cracked up and admitted that the Barrett ban would never come off the books.
He’s probably right, but I can maintain hope 🙂
Barret actually is making a “california special” rifle that is supposed to have similar characteristics to the 50BMG, except its a 416caliber.
Its yet another “gun bans are dumb” guns.
As far as assassinations/etc, I would probably stick with a .338 lapuaa or a Remington 700 warmed over with some goodies. The Remington uses conventionally available ammo so its technically a better choice.
There’s one other thing, the 50BMG is generally not usedfor sniping (other than competition shooting), its meant for anti-vehicular usage. Under the geneva convention you’re not allowed to shoot people with it 🙂
Point taken, but if I were a
Point taken, but if I were a politician afraid of assassination I doubt I’d feel any comfort in the thought that my killer might observe the Geneva conventions.
heh, very true 🙂
Although,
heh, very true 🙂
Although, any 50BMG would not be an ideal rifle for politician assassination either due to its size. A 40 – 50LB weapon is not ideal for transport while trying to be incognito.
I’d fit in my car.…
A
I’d fit in my car.…
A better way to get rid of bad politicians would be a “nuclear event” while Congress is in session. As I recall, in the Bible God required there to be ten good men in Sodom if he were not to destroy it. Congress fails that test by a large margin.
Dad