Playing chicken with cancer

Yes­ter­day Gov Jer­ry Brown signed into law AB 499 which allows minor chil­dren age 12 or old­er to give legal con­sent for treat­ment for sex­u­al­ly trans­mit­ted dis­eases with­out parental con­sent or notice. This bill (now part of the Cal­i­for­nia Fam­i­ly Code) has gained tremen­dous noto­ri­ety because of its asso­ci­a­tion with the vac­cine Gar­dasil, the same vac­cine for which Gov Rick Per­ry of Texas has endured crit­i­cism recent­ly. Gov Per­ry signed an exec­u­tive order in 2007 which man­dat­ed that girls … Read the rest

Obama to California: my autocracy beats your democracy

Today, the four Cal­i­for­nia US Attor­neys — at the orders of the Oba­ma admin­is­tra­tion — are tak­ing steps to shut down mar­i­jua­na dis­pen­saries in Cal­i­for­nia. Dis­pen­saries have been ordered closed. Fed­er­al pros­e­cu­tors have sent let­ters to six­teen pot clubs and their land­lords instruct­ing them that their prop­er­ty will be seized if they don’t shut down operations.

Why the Oba­ma admin­is­tra­tion thinks it’s impor­tant to waste resources on mar­i­jua­na enforce­ment in Cal­i­for­nia is unclear and frankly pathet­ic. The so-called war on Read the rest

How do market forces prevent gas main explosions?

This post is the first in the Invis­i­ble San­ta Bun­ny top­ic, so named because of a com­menter’s wry query about how the «Mag­i­cal San­ta Bun­ny of the Free Mar­ket» would address cer­tain prob­lems with­out leg­is­la­tion, com­bined with Adam Smith’s famous «invis­i­ble hand» of the free mar­ket. It’s a chest­nut of lib­er­tar­i­an rhetoric that prob­lems will resolve them­selves with mar­ket-dri­ven pri­vate-sec­tor fix­es, and that those fix­es both will be more effec­tive and will bet­ter pro­mote free­dom. This top­ic explores that idea Read the rest

A few gay men

Update: this is a joke. Cpt Hill nev­er said any of this. It was lift­ed from Col Jessep’s mono­logue in the film A Few Good Men. It would be an appro­pri­ate response to Rick San­to­rum’s answer to Cpt Hill’s ques­tion, but it is entire­ly fic­tion­al. I’d thought it would be obvi­ous, but it seems that quot­ing a movie that’s almost 20 years old gets lost. I apol­o­gize to any­one who earnest­ly believed these to be Cpt Hill’s words. 

Stephen … Read the rest

September 22 GOP debate wrapup

On Thurs­day, nine con­tenders for the GOP nom­i­na­tion for pres­i­dent par­tic­i­pat­ed in a tele­vised ques­tion-and-answer ses­sion host­ed by Fox News and Google. As usu­al, I hes­i­tate to refer to these events as «debates» because they real­ly aren’t debates. There’s not enough time allot­ted to per­mit more than a sound­bite on each issue and there are few real chances for rebut­tal. They are all about the per­son­al­i­ties and very lit­tle about the prin­ci­ples and issues.

Here is my take on the … Read the rest

The elephant in the room

Tonight at 6pm Pacific/9pm East­ern time, nine GOP pres­i­den­tial hope­fuls will take the stage in a live ques­tion and answer ses­sion intend­ed to famil­iar­ize Amer­i­cans with the can­di­dates. This will be the sev­enth so-called debate in the 2012 pres­i­den­tial pri­ma­ry sea­son, and the sec­ond to include Gov­er­nor Gary John­son, who appeared in the first of these debates back in May but who has not been per­mit­ted to par­tic­i­pate since. In a sur­prise (but wel­come) deci­sion on … Read the rest

Libertarian: better adjective than noun

Recent­ly I lis­tened to a Com­mon­wealth Club dis­cus­sion with Nick Gille­spie and Matt Welch titled WWLD: What Would Lib­er­tar­i­ans Do? Gille­spie and Welch are co-edi­tors of Rea­son mag­a­zine, which I’ve nev­er read, but is reput­ed to have a strong lib­er­tar­i­an bent. The top­ic is of inter­est to me, as I have mixed feel­ings about lib­er­tar­i­ans. In the 1990s I was a reg­is­tered mem­ber of the Lib­er­tar­i­an Par­ty. I vot­ed for Har­ry Browne in the pres­i­den­tial elec­tions of 1996Read the rest

WINO

Most politi­cians deserve a lit­tle name-call­ing, but there are two labels — real­ly two vari­a­tions on the same label — that have become pop­u­lar late­ly and real­ly get my goat. They are RINO and DINO: Repub­li­can In Name Only and Demo­c­rat In Name Only. Even Lib­er­tar­i­ans call oth­er Lib­er­tar­i­ans LINOs, Greens have their GINOs, and prob­a­bly even Inde­pen­dents who get called IINOs even though I have no idea how to pro­nounce it.

I make an excep­tion for the use of … Read the rest

Ignoring the Constitution: it’s not just for Democrats anymore

After tak­ing a shot at Rick San­to­rum about the appar­ent incon­gruity between his strict con­struc­tion­ist stance and his zeal for fed­er­al restric­tions on abor­tions, I was grat­i­fied to see that I was­n’t the only one to notice. The Volokh Con­spir­a­cy, one of the best law-ori­ent­ed blogs out there, today has a post by David Kopel point­ing out that San­to­rum and four oth­er Repub­li­can pres­i­den­tial can­di­dates have signed a pledge that states almost in the same breath that they will appoint … Read the rest

Sympathy for the devil

I chal­lenge any­one to pro­vide a rep­utable source for this sup­posed quote attrib­uted to GOP pres­i­den­tial hope­ful Rick Santorum:

Abor­tion in any form is wrong, except for my wife. If your wife’s life was at stake and the only thing that could save her was an abor­tion, well, too bad. Your wife will have to die. It was dif­fer­ent with my wife. You see, I love her. I don’t even know your wife’s name. 

I call bull­shit on this whole … Read the rest