Gift
*(When used as a verb) to transform a possession into a present by giving it to someone.*
This holiday season Sears’s slogan is «how to gift.»
I know more than a couple people who share a pet peeve: the use of the word *gift* as a verb. They complain with good justification that it is common to turn a noun into a verb in place of choosing words with enough care that no made-up word would be necessary. Normally I’d be in agreement, but in the case of *gift* I’ve defended the usage.
The difference in usage is whether the emphasis is on the gift or the recipient. Whether one gives or gifts a watch to a friend, the friend gets the watch. But if the watch is gifted, we know that it was a present, not a loan or given over for repair. Just because I gave my friend the watch so that he could look at it up close, doesn’t mean it was a gift.
Further, the important part of gift is the object rather than the recipient. If I say that I have given to the Red Cross, you don’t know whether I donated money, blood, or something else. Conversely I can *gift* a nice pen because I’m no longer using it, without specifying who the recipient is.
But here is where I take issue with the way Sears (and a couple of other stores this year) use the word *gift*. When you *gift* something, it is transformed from an ordinary possession into something else: a gift. If you buy something expressly to be a present for someone, it’s already a gift the moment it comes into your possession. At that point you can certainly *give* your gift to someone, but it has already been turned into a gift.
Unless Sears means that their lifetime-warranty Craftsman tools are good heirlooms and encouraging us to give them to our friends in lieu of buying presents from a store this holiday season, Sears is not «how to gift.»
long time usage
I have a minor quibble with your implication that the use of “gift” as a verb is new. The OED shows this usage as dating back to the early 1600’s. I do like the clarity of your distinction between “give” and “gift.”
Dad
Sorry. I didn’t mean to imply
Sorry. I didn’t mean to imply that the usage was new. I suspect that many of the nouns people complain have been verbized are also not new. Further, even the ones that are «new» date back forty to eighty years. I agree that adding verb suffixes to nouns is usually lazy but not at all that every word that’s happened to has been a bad thing. We otherwise wouldn’t have terms like railroading which add metaphorical color to our language.