8.4 miles, strong finish
I did 8.4 miles today along the Marina Green and the Embarcadero. I split it into three legs, out to the end of the Marina Green (plus a trip to the end of the Municipal Pier) and back, which is 2.7 miles each way, plus an additional run out almost to the Ferry Building and back, which is an even three miles. There’s one small hill at Fort Mason that I have to hit twice, but it’s mostly a flat course all around.
I figured that if I could average better than a nine minute mile on my Twin Peaks five mile course, that I should be able to average an eight minute mile on a mostly flat run. Well, I hit the split button at the end of the first 2.7 and did some not-so-quick math (math is hard when I’m running) and realized I was running a bit behind my target pace. So I tried upping the energy level a bit on the return leg and sure enough, I was still behind my target pace on the second 2.7. So with three miles to go, I poured on some more steam and pushed through.
It didn’t feel like I was going much faster through the last leg, but it did seem like it was a harder push. And in the last mile, I started getting a side-stitch. I hoped that side-stitches aren’t actual damage and pushed on through; that last mile was over-the top push for me.
I finished in 1:06:09, which is an average 7:52 pace. Right on target, EXCELLENT! But looking at my split times, it was really the final leg that did it for me. the first leg I completed in a 8:16/mile pace, the second where I thought I was working harder an 8:26/mile pace. And the final three miles were done at a 7:00/mile pace. According to my heartrate monitor, my average heartrates for the legs were 170, 179, and 185. Which indicates that indeed I was working much harder in the second leg than the first, and a little bit harder in the last than the second. Draw your own conclusions, because it doesn’t make a lot of sense to me that I would work harder to go slower on the same course, and then work a little bit harder to go a lot faster.
Regardless, I’m a little disappointed that I didn’t sustain an eight minute mile for the whole course. If I had it in me to do three miles at seven minutes per mile at the end, I probably could have done the whole course a little bit more evenly.
Still, if I’m going to go at it unevenly, this is the way to do it. Start slow to make sure I have the mileage under my belt, then use up what’s left in the end. That strategy beats burning out early and then slowing down over the whole course. but I can certainly use some improvement in gauging my pace for the longer runs.
This encourages me, too, of course. This is the first time I’ve ever cracked the eight minute mile on a run longer than four miles. It proves I’ve got more in me than I’ve been giving myself credit for. And I’m going to need every bit of that “more in me than I’ve been giving myself credit for” if I’m going to complete a marathon in under 7:30/mile to qualify for Boston 2006. Oh, did I just admit that’s a goal? I guess now’s as good a time as any to make it an official declared goal:
To complete a sanctioned marathon in 7:26/mile before the qualifying deadline for the 2006 Boston Marathon.
I’ve basically got ten months to get there from here. I’ll need all your support.