Agendum

Yes, you guessed it. This is the sin­gu­lar of agen­da. And yes, its use is some­what archa­ic. OED calls it «now rare» and Cham­bers does­n’t list it at all. Agen­da’s mod­ern usage is clear­ly sin­gu­lar; one looks at the agen­da before begin­ning a meet­ing, and some­one pro­mot­ing polit­i­cal views is said to have an agenda.

But it is at least use­ful to under­stand agen­da as a list, as opposed to sim­ply «that which some­one wants done». It’s a list, … Read the rest

Perk

I hate being wrong. Prob­a­bly no one likes it very much. I know that being wrong is part of the sci­en­tif­ic process and that many sci­en­tists delight in being wrong. I can relate to that. I tend to love new dis­cov­er­ies. But new dis­cov­er­ies also tend to be some­thing I’ve inten­tion­al­ly ques­tioned, per­haps even knew I did not know. I get frus­trat­ed when I dis­cov­er that some­thing I was absolute­ly cer­tain was true sim­ply is not so.

In the case of … Read the rest

Bespoke

A friend on Face­book recent­ly asked why any­one would use bespoke when cus­tom is a per­fect­ly good word. The post sparked a flur­ry of respons­es about the fad­dish use of bespoke and its use to put on airs. I was remind­ed me that I looked up bespoke in the dic­tio­nary less than a year ago. My too-infre­quent­ly fol­lowed rule here is to write an entry when I look a word up in the dic­tio­nary, so I am respond­ing here.

I looked

Read the rest

Gulosity

Anoth­er word found in Go Set a Watch­man. It usu­al­ly says good things about a nov­el when I have to look up mul­ti­ple words in one sit­ting. Not always; some­times it seems like the obscure words don’t add val­ue. I have mixed feel­ings about the use of gulos­i­ty here. If I were asked to edit this I might not insist it get replaced but I’d want to have a con­ver­sa­tion about why it was impor­tant. Per­haps it’s archa­ic, but

Read the rest

Fettle

Found in the 25 Jan­u­ary 2014 edi­tion of *The Econ­o­mist*. The for­mer mil­i­tary dic­ta­tor of Pak­istan, Perez Mushar­raf, was described by doc­tors as being in «pret­ty good fet­tle» despite claims of a heart attack for which there was no evi­dence, and upon which his lawyers claimed he was not healthy enough to be tried for high treason.

Thanks go to *The Econ­o­mist* for expand­ing my vocab­u­lary, a task oth­er pub­li­ca­tions seem reluc­tant to take on. … Read the rest

Complete and utter

I came across this in the first para­graph of an old post and cringed. First, «com­plete and utter» seems redun­dant. Per­haps it isn’t always; the two words have some­what dif­fer­ent def­i­n­i­tions if very sim­i­lar usage. It’s pos­si­ble that one would want to spec­i­fy both that some­thing is not only total­ly what­ev­er attribute is being ascribed, but that attribute in the most extreme manner.

I’m hav­ing trou­ble com­ing up with an exam­ple of that hypo­thet­i­cal, which leads me all the more … Read the rest

Transitive

When I took French in high school I came across the con­cept of tran­si­tive ver­sus intran­si­tive verbs. Per­haps this dis­tinc­tion was made in my stud­ies of Eng­lish, but what I recall is a spe­cif­ic con­ver­sa­tion in French class.

While try­ing to grasp what my teacher was telling me, I asked whether a tran­si­tive verb was one that required a direct object. I hoped that was a dif­fer­ent way of say­ing what she had been telling us, and that she would

Read the rest

Leach

Mr Lanier strikes again. 

When I came across the sen­tence, «The strange­ness is being leached away by the mush-mak­ing process» in *You Are Not A Gad­get* I thought at first that I’d stum­bled across a typo that had escaped the edi­tor’s eye. I expect­ed that he meant *leeched* as in, sucked away as though by a par­a­site. While this would have made enough sense, Lanier’s choice indeed seems more appropriate. 

For­tu­nate­ly, I thought for a moment about who was more … Read the rest

eschatology

Anoth­er one found in Jaron Lanier’s [*You Are Not A Gadget*]([canonical-url:2013/05/26/finding-internets-inner-human]). Lanier is earn­ing points with me for teach­ing me words. This one in par­tic­u­lar I am sur­prised not to have encoun­tered before, as it is a field of great inter­est to me. I sup­pose the mat­ter is prob­a­bly of great inter­est to every­one, but even so. 

This comes from the Greek, mean­ing «final dis­course». As is so often the case going back to the … Read the rest